SOLO DIALOUGE
SOLO DIALOUGE
Solo Dialogue is a creative component of my PhD research project (2018-2022), investigating time and intersubjectivity in solo dance improvisation: how can various aspects of time be animated in the intersubjective space between the dancer and a watcher/witness/observer. In collaboration with solo dancer, Janette Hoe, this project is an interlocution through dancing and dialoguing between Janette and I. We took turn to be dancer and watcher, then we discuss what's going on. This web page documented some of our dancing and dialoguing during the period of May-November 2020 when we were in lockdowns due to COVID-19 pandemic. Using the ideas of 'emergence' and 'resilience' as choreographic strategies, we worked through a series of 'studio research', mostly at home via Zoom meetings, leading up to the filming of the performance in January-February 2021.
GROSSERY:
Jo-ha-kyū 序破急: a sequencing concept in Noh theatre denoting a begining-middle-end process of a movement phrase, a section of a dance, and/or the whole Noh play.
Ma 間: a non-doing gap or interval between movement or performance elements, a gap between jo-ha-kyū arc of something...
Solo Dialouge (2021)
The research project culminated in the filming of Solo Dialouge in January-February 2021. Similar to the structure of our studio research, Janette and I took turn to perform series of improvisation exploring embodied temporality while being watched.
Duration: Approx. 75 minutes
Videographer: Cobie Orger
Production manager: Kris Chaney
Filmed at Studio 864-221, Dance Building, Victorian College of the Arts, Faculty of Fine Arts and Music, University of Melbourne Southbank Campus.
Study#10: Semblance and event
November 25, 2020
Semblance is understood as “outward appearance or apparent form of something, especially when the reality is different.” (OED) In performance, sometimes in stillness and silence, we feel something is happening. Instead of brushing this vague experience as illusion and not real, philosopher Brian Massumi argues that “isn’t ‘something happening’ the very definition of real?”[1]. This appearance of ‘something happening’ is what Massumi refers to as ‘semblance’. At the moment when a semblance is noticed, the dancing body is “capacitated”[2] where the capacity is virtual and yet to go somewhere, but it is the moment full of potential. To me, semblance holds a suspenseful potential where movement is generated. Not any old movement, it is a movement event with an arc of how it happens – there is beginning-middle-end, there is a jo-ha-kyū process. In this improvisation, I used the score: “The biscuit in the pocket” where I held my awareness of semblance and used it to begin the jo of a small grain of movement. As this awareness became thickened, my movement was generated as if it spilled out of the semblance. I perceived the semblance as an activation of various systems in my body. At the same time, I not only perceived movement events, but also felt myself perceiving it. Not thinking about a perceptual experience by reflecting about it as an after thought, it is a moment of “thinking-feeling – a direct, immediate self-referential of perception.”[3]. This self-referential thinking-feeling, in turn, feeds into more semblance, resulting in more movement events. This has been one of the most important aspects of sequencing jo-ha-kyū layers in my improvisation.
[1] Brian Massumi. Semblance and Event: Activist Philosophy and the Occurent Arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011., 41.
[2] Ibid., 43.
[3] Ibid., 44.
Study#9: Backformation
October 28, 2020
How is a movement realised as an arc? In fact, the answer lies in the paradox of the arrow as Brian Massumi writes, "A path is not composed of positions. It is nondecomposable: a dynamic unity. That continuity of movement is of an order of reality rather than the measurable, divisible space it can be confirmed as having crossed. It does not stop until it stops. Then, and only then, is the arrow in position. It is only after the arrow hits the mark that its real trajectory may be plotted." (Quoted in Bleeker 2015, 77) So, as I move, I only realise an arc of a movement after the arc is already formed – Massumi calls this process "backformation." This means that an arc of jo-ha-kyū in my improvisation can be understood as 'backformed' in my perception. Each arc of movement is in itself an event – there are so many precesses going on in generating movement. Each arc of event is also a fragment of a larger arc or event of which my memory accrues to form layers of events,
Study#7: The juncture of movement and voice
October 5, 2020
Radiohead's I Will is a song that comes up in this exploration voice/movement juncture. It felt apt particularly during this long lockdown in Melbourne.
I set a task to explore the voice/movement juncture – what kind of attention or timing between movement, breath and utterance. One useful strategy is to delay the impulse until the field of attention is thickened. The lyrics and movement co-exist: movement can corroborate the lyrics or negate from its meaning. Delaying impulse allows me some time to sequence the action: to follow the impulse or leave it alone.
Study#6: Everywhere is now site-specific
September 18, 2020
Having been dancing outside the studio for more than 5 months, the studio is no longer a default setting in my practice. While exploring the granularity of jo-ha-kyū, being outside in open environment, I needed to choose sensory inputs to work with. I used a strategy of 'attentive waiting' to allow my body to take in various stimulus and see where the field of attention landed and became thickened.
While waiting attentively, I noticed many things that were apparent as well as surprising to me. What was apparent was the presence of the gum trees as I always look up to their branches to see if any of them are endangering of falling down. The surprising were that I noticed the minuscule organisms that live in my small backyard – grass pushing up the brick pavement, weeds of all sizes and shapes, bees, wasps worms and other strange creatures I don't know.
Can attentive waiting be performative – a genuine choreographic material – a moment in which there is nothing is needed to fill?
August–September 2020
Practicing solo without Janette's gaze
Suddenly, Victoria was in Stage 4 lockdown as the second wave of COVID-19 hit us with 700+ new infection cases per day. My studio bookings are cancelled and we had 'Zoom fatigue' from May – July period. While Janette and I were in regular contact, I continued to work on my perceptual tools. I turned my attention to granular movement, real or virtual. Without having to confined my space to the Zoom camera, I ventured out to practice at various spaces in my house including the beloved backyard, living room and bedroom.
Once outside, the perceptual tools openned up to ferocious sensory inputs – the two majestic gum trees, a small field of peppermint I grow, other plants and small aminmals. I felt there was no need for music as sound in open environment was already so rich that I had to make an effort to discern what sound I could relate to.
The small image gallery on the left shows a collection of studio notes and elements in my improvisation practice, along with drawings approximating my improvisations.
Study#5: Intersubjective matrix
July 31, 2020
Janette: I was wondering what excites me about texture that inspires me to dance? Something that gives a sense of impermanence. There is something about memory and time that comes into play; also, the physical tactile and texture that triggers my memory. I see memory as a part of texture in my mind – the crossover between texture, time and memory.
Naree: ...what struck me the most was the crawling of the hands, I felt what I took from watching you wasn’t explicit things that you did – not the hands. When it was my turn to do the second improv, my body was as if we are chatting and something suddenly popped up in my head and I wanted to tell you something. So, I told you about the chef (Josh Niland) who treats fish with respect and uses 90% of any fish he has in his kitchen.
Study#4: Dialoguing
July 17, 2020
Naree: To me, your first improv was your jo——it's as if you just got started——and it has its own arc too. In the second one, you went full-bodied, grounded, stretched. The particular quality of the first improv permeated deeper in your body in the second one.
I carried that quality in your second improv into my third improv. I don’t know where the voice came from – I guess it’s from a breath, the viscerality I simulated from you.
Janette: My second improv also carried through with what you did, which was the percussive hands on the ground, the noise, the surface created the meeting point with hands. I felt it occurring in my body. Perhaps one of the things I took from your improv is a sort of rhythmic information by absorption, not really formulating too much. It was just – I’m looking, I’m watching, I’m listening.
Study#3: Words|thought|movement|dialogue
July 3, 2020
Naree: My movement process emerged as an arc, but it’s a two-way thing. It’s relational to your gaze upon me. It’s almost like I had to ‘radiate’ my movement process and my intension for her to know, realising that her gaze is enough on me to progress. I have to realise her gaze to ‘time’ my movement process.
Janette: I wanted to play with the sound of words, bringing up different qualities of the words, and granularity of the ingredients like salt or pepper, bringing a sort of relationship with sound and words, oscillating between the visuals of the objects and specific sensation to my felt sense in my body.
June 2020
Emergence strategy
As the COVID-19 pandemic is likely to change artistic practices forever, I ask myself what can I do in my performing and dance-making practice to make the most of this once-in-a-century event and come out the other side more informed? I looked up the book Emergent Strategy by Adrienne Maree Brown on using the notion of emergence to organise complex systems in perpetual motion. My artistic practice in relation to my world is such as system where I could learn from how Brown organises a social justice movement. Brown's emergent strategy is inspired by biomimicry – an ancient notion that has been working well for humanity to imitate nature. In his Noh treatises, there are evidences that Zeami conceptualised jo-ha-kyū by keenly observing nature and emulate its process. The more I learn about Brown's emergent strategy, the more I think jo-ha-kyū is characterised by the hallmarks of biomimicry – "fractal, adaptive, interdepent, non-linear and iterative, resilient and creating more possibilities." (Brown, 2017)
Study#2: Words|thought|movement
May 29, 2020
The lockdown has eased. We can go outside. I went over to Janette's place and did our first face-to-face practice in three months. In the small space, we tried "enactive filming" (Parker, 2019) where the viewer held the camera and moved with the camera while being guided by how the dance was perceived by the viewer. In our case, the viewer is also a dancer – we use our sensorimotor knowledge to access our perceptual experience into which the footage translates.
The score for today aimed to explore the junctures between movement, thought and words.
Study#1:Micro-movement
Study#1:Micro-movement
The lockdown brought about many challenges in our practices. We've found that through digital communication, our dancing bodies absorb the gaze differently – we have to work a lot harder to connect to the other person on the screen. This changes our temporality significantly. In the previous sessions, we got interrupted due to shared space we're working in. So, Janette suggested that we explored 'micro-movement'. This is not the same as Steve Paxton's "small dance". It's more like we're shifting the focus to the invisible parts of our movment arcs.
Then there's the factor of framing our dancing to the screen. Our first attempts were to exploring the inside-outside of the frame (the video on the left and middle.) I had another try to acknowledge the framing, but almost just performing the invisibility of my movement arcs.
All rights reserved © Naree Vachananda